-
 KDE-Apps.org Applications for the KDE-Desktop 
 GTK-Apps.org Applications using the GTK Toolkit 
 GnomeFiles.org Applications for GNOME 
 CLI-Apps.org Command Line Applications 
 MeeGo-Central.org Applications for MeeGo 
 Qt-Apps.org Free Qt Applications 
 Qt-Prop.org Proprietary Qt Applications 
 Maemo-Apps.org Applications for the Maemo Plattform 
 Java-Apps.org Free Java Applications 
 eyeOS-Apps.org Free eyeOS Applications 
 Wine-Apps.org Wine Applications 
 Server-Apps.org Server Applications 
--
-
 KDE-Look.org Artwork for the KDE-Desktop 
 GNOME-Look.org Artwork for the GNOME-Desktop 
 Xfce-Look.org Artwork for the Xfce-Desktop 
 Box-Look.org Artwork for your Windowmanager 
 E17-Stuff.org Artwork for Enlightenment 
 Beryl-Themes.org Artwork for the Beryl Windowmanager 
 Compiz-Themes.org Artwork for the Compiz Windowmanager 
 EDE-Look.org Themes for your EDE Desktop 
--
-
 Debian-Art.org Stuff for Debian 
 Gentoo-Art.org Artwork for Gentoo Linux 
 SUSE-Art.org Artwork for openSUSE 
 Ubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Ubuntu 
 Kubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Kubuntu 
 LinuxMint-Art.org Artwork for Linux Mint 
 Arch-Stuff.org Art And Stuff for Arch Linux 
 Fedora-Art.org Artwork for Fedora Linux 
 Mandriva-Art.org Artwork for Mandriva Linux 
--
-
 KDE-Files.org Files for KDE Applications 
 OpenTemplate.org Documents for OpenOffice.org
 GIMPStuff.org Files for GIMP
 InkscapeStuff.org Files for Inkscape
 ScribusStuff.org Files for Scribus
 BlenderStuff.org Textures and Objects for Blender
--
-
 KDE-Help.org Support for your KDE Desktop 
 GNOME-Help.org Support for your GNOME Desktop 
 Xfce-Help.org Support for your Xfce Desktop 
--
openDesktop.orgopenDesktop.org:   Applications   Artwork   Linux Distributions   Documents    LinuxDaily.com    Linux42.org    OpenSkillz.com    Open-PC.com   
Products
Forum
People
Register
Login





-
- global .- support .- hardware .- software .- brainstorming . 
-
.

 Standard rather than product?

 
 by RyanMcCoskrie on: Sep 26 2009
 
RyanMcCoskrieRyanMcCoskri e
KGuitar, Virt16
Home
-
Ryan McCoskrie
KGuitar, Virt16
New Zealand, Amberley
Last visit Sep 5 2010
0 Friends

Send a message
Add as friend
More info
--

Should we try getting some physical
stores on-board by allowing put these
things together them selves?

In my own view this is analogous to
allowing people to compile themselves.

Just a suggestion.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Standard rather than product?

 
 by RyanMcCoskrie on: Sep 26 2009
 
RyanMcCoskrieRyanMcCoskri e
KGuitar, Virt16
Home
-
Ryan McCoskrie
KGuitar, Virt16
New Zealand, Amberley
Last visit Sep 5 2010
0 Friends

Send a message
Add as friend
More info
--

Note: I did have a reason to place this
under support but then changed my mind
and forgot to change the section.

Hope nobody minds.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Standard rather than product?

 
 by hastemanemark on: Oct 1 2009
 

I actually find that a good idea. If we allow the vendors to assemble it themselves, maybe the platform can even be pricier, as the dealers often get the parts at lower cost.
Then, of course, the price may not be part of the standard, you suggested.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Standard rather than product?

 
 by RyanMcCoskrie on: Oct 4 2009
 
RyanMcCoskrieRyanMcCoskri e
KGuitar, Virt16
Home
-
Ryan McCoskrie
KGuitar, Virt16
New Zealand, Amberley
Last visit Sep 5 2010
0 Friends

Send a message
Add as friend
More info
--

The problem that this creates is exactly
who handles support?

Will we handle all things software and
the vendors do the hardware issues
(they have the advantage of a physical
presence) or will all support be in our
hands? Will we do any support?

Then there's the issue of whether or not
we try wholesaling to the chain stores.

Somehow I doubt Harvey Norman[1] would
be willing to touch Linux with anything
other than fdisk.
Dick Smiths[2] might be willing though.

[1]Major home electronics chain in NZ.
[2]Initially sold electronic components,
some branches still keep a couple of
LED's etc in the back.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: Re: Standard rather than product?

 
 by Natanael90 on: Oct 10 2009
 

Certification could be used.

Some kind of compitability testing method could be used, and everybody who wants a certificate has to apply for it.


http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/betamax_supreme_ct.pdf
\"The Court explains that a manufacturer of a product is not liable for contributory infringement as long as the product is capable of sub

Reply to this

-

 Re: Pros and Cons of this path

 
 by RyanMcCoskrie on: Oct 14 2009
 
RyanMcCoskrieRyanMcCoskri e
KGuitar, Virt16
Home
-
Ryan McCoskrie
KGuitar, Virt16
New Zealand, Amberley
Last visit Sep 5 2010
0 Friends

Send a message
Add as friend
More info
--

The real problem that I thought of last
night is that most of these shops (at
least where I live) are Windows only
operations.

If we convince some to sell computers
running Linux we're going to have to get
them up to speed extremely quickly _and_
help them with any problems they hit.

That said getting retailers on board
will give a very strong, very visible
and _trusted_ presence which is exactly
what Linux needs.

If we do decide to make the Open PC a
standard and have shops sell it we are
going to have be prepared to make sure
that they can service malfunctioning machines.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Pros and Cons of this path

 
 by Natanael90 on: Nov 4 2009
 

Here in Sweden it's usually the manufacturers that deal with repairs, as far as I know.

If we can set up central repair shops/centers/whatever that can as well as support that can deal with that stuff in each country we're selling computers in, then that's no issue.

Big retailers that sell what they get from manufacturers will sell the computers as-is, the smaller ones who does customization will make sure they comply to standards and deal with most service/support themselves.

There should also be two "stamps": "Original Open-PC" and "Custom Open-PC". Original is computers from open-pc.com, custom is everything else. And all manufacturers will have to comply to standards and make sure they don't brake any rules to be allowed to use it.


http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax/betamax_supreme_ct.pdf
\"The Court explains that a manufacturer of a product is not liable for contributory infringement as long as the product is capable of sub

Reply to this

-
.

 Difficulties

 
 by sdsondhi on: Jan 8 2010
 
sdsondhisdsondhi
Personal
-
SD Sondhi
Personal
India, bangalore
Last visit Aug 17 2010
0 Friends

Send a message
Add as friend
More info
--

A Compiled PC will require it to be a desktop pc as there are huge spatial and technological restrictions in the netbook and notebook styles finalized by the partakers in the survey.
It would be great if this could be net enabled to allow online order placement shunting the order off to local vendors who will assemble the systems and provide services.


Reply to this

-

 recovery medium

 
 by teotwawki on: Jan 20 2010
 

Bundling a physical CD adds cost and confusion but a user is unlikely to download a recovery CD image before needing it.

Why not include a recovery CD image in the user's data area (as with the user manual) and launch a wizard every few days until they follow a guided process to burn the image to a disc.

You could also offer an optional branded USB flash drive with bootable recovery image pre-installed.


Reply to this

Add commentBack



-
-
Should we book advertising in magazine?
 No. too expensive
 No. Makes no sense
 I´m not sure
 Yes. Good idea

resultmore

 
 Who we are
Contact
More about us
Register
Twitter
Blog
Explore
People
Participate
Forum
Public API
About Open-PC.com
Legal Notice
Spreadshirt Shop
CafePress Shop
Report Abuse
 

Copyright 2009-2010 Open-PC.com Team  
All rights reserved. Open-PC.com is not liable for any content or goods on this site.
All contributors are responsible for the lawfulness of their uploads.
Open-PC is a trademark of h i v e 01 gmbh